Senate GOP Says ‘Arctic Frost’ Subpoenas Reached 400+ Targets; Nunes Alleges Trump Media Bank Records Were Secretly Sought

60
Profile view of Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley speaking at the Guthrie Center Courthouse in 2017. Grassley later played a central role in publicizing Senate Judiciary Committee findings that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Arctic Frost probe sought banking and communications data from hundreds of Republican-linked targets, including Trump Media.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is seen speaking with constituents at the Guthrie Center Courthouse in Guthrie Center, Iowa, on May 31, 2017. Grassley recently led the release of documents revealing that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s “Arctic Frost” investigation issued nearly 200 subpoenas targeting over 400 individuals and entities connected to former President Donald Trump — including, according to Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes, a secret subpoena of Trump Media’s bank records. File photo: CJ Hanevy, licensed.

WASHINGTON, D.C. A newly published compilation of subpoenas shows that former Special Counsel Jack Smith issued 197 separate legal demands in connection with the so-called Arctic Frost investigation – covering records for more than 430 Republican-linked individuals and organizations. At the same time, Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (TMTG) says it discovered its bank records were subpoenaed by the same probe, despite the company not existing during many of the events under investigation.

The disclosure, made public by the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary (Republican majority) on October 29, 2025, reveals that 34 individuals and 163 businesses received subpoenas in connection with Arctic Frost – an investigation that preceded Smith’s criminal case against former President Donald J. Trump relating to the 2020 election.

According to the committee’s release, the subpoenas sought testimony, communications and financial records from a broad range of entities including banks, media companies, and organizations linked to conservative causes.

On the same day, TMTG issued a statement via CEO and Chairman Devin Nunes asserting the company learned its banking records at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. had been subpoenaed – even though the company says it did not exist during the timeframe of the events being investigated. The company called the subpoena “stunning abuse of power” and said it intends to inquire what the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and JPMorgan knew about the request.

The newly released materials show that major telecommunications carriers including Verizon Communications Inc. and AT&T Inc. received subpoenas for toll-record data tied to certain members of Congress during the investigation. In one case, Verizon complied, AT&T did not. The subpoenas sought metadata (call logs, not content) for a four-day period in January 2021.

Republican senators have labeled the investigation a politicized “enemies list,” with concerns that the investigative tools of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI were used to target political opponents. The senators are calling for further oversight, including the public testimony of Jack Smith and full access to DOJ and FBI records relating to the matter.

Democrats on the committee have responded by requesting unredacted documents and cautioning against premature conclusions. The DOJ has not publicly detailed which specific accounts or companies were under subpoena in TMTG’s case or the full list of entities affected by Arctic Frost.

The scale of subpoenas unveiled by the Senate committee, nearly 200 demands covering hundreds of targets, underscores the broad reach of the Arctic Frost investigation and raises questions about the legal boundaries of federal probes into political and financial actors.

Key Facts & Details:

ItemDetail
Number of subpoenas released197
Number of named individuals/entities targetedAt least 430
Number of individuals subpoenaed34
Number of businesses subpoenaed163
Company alleging bank-record subpoenaTrump Media & Technology Group Corp.
Time period for phone data subpoenasJanuary 4-7, 2021

As the TMTG allegation and Senate disclosures converge, the debate is shifting from whether investigations took place to how and why they were conducted. The coming weeks may bring hearings, document releases, and possible policy changes in how federal investigative powers intersect with political actors and private business.

Comment via Facebook

Corrections: If you are aware of an inaccuracy or would like to report a correction, we would like to know about it. Please consider sending an email to [email protected] and cite any sources if available. Thank you. (Policy)